INCLINE VILLAGE, Nev. - nvtip -- Following his recent public willingness to testify on Capitol Hill, Phinge is previewing additional remarks to be added to Founder and CEO Robert C. DeMaio's proposed congressional testimony if invited.

Driven by the broad, overreaching implications that unverified artificial intelligence and its infrastructure pose to the public at large, Mr. DeMaio is actively anticipating formal legislative invitations from U.S. House committees governing intellectual property, privacy, and digital markets, alongside U.S. Senate committees governing technology, privacy, and antitrust and other relevant committees to champion the absolute right of users to own, control, and monetize their own personal data.

Here are Mr. DeMaio's proposed added remarks:

The urgency of this moment has been punctuated by massive market developments that occurred just days ago. Two dominant titans of consumer and enterprise AI made simultaneous market announcements regarding their new data sovereignty and safety architectures. One announced a major shift in its chatbot data retention policy, allowing select users to isolate and house data traffic entirely on their own customer-hosted cloud storage log frameworks. On the exact same day, another AI company countered by unveiling a parallel safety system designed to avoid central retention of customer data entirely.

Even if we set aside the potential infringement of Phinge and Robert DeMaio's intellectual property rights for our federal courts to decide, these announcements prove something monumentally profound: they prove that the technology these giant AI companies are releasing already has the inherent technical capability to deliver data sovereignty, such as privacy, yet it still lacks the ability for individuals to own, control, and monetize their own data, likeness, and IP.

More on nvtip.com

• When the Coroner's Report Isn't Enough: Colorado Families Turn to Private Autopsy for Closure
• Nearly One-Third of CRE Asset Managers Make Major Capital Decisions on Gut Instinct, New Survey Finds
• RemoteBridge Names Dr. John N. Just, Ed.D. Chief Executive Officer
• Project CIVICA Report Finds 10,680 Non-Citizen Indicators on New York Voter Rolls — Including 88 Records with Recent Voting History
• New Analysis Details Three Converging Forces in AI and Workforce Policy Behind a $37 Billion GDP Reduction

They are openly demonstrating that data privacy is entirely achievable right now. Yet, despite increasingly having this capability, a critical examination of these simultaneous rollouts exposes a profound structural double standard: both providers are restricting these critical data sovereign privacy, and safety frameworks exclusively to their premium, paying enterprise B2B customers. By intentionally locking even partial data sovereignty behind an enterprise paywall, these tech behemoths have engineered an unfair, dual-class digital ecosystem. Corporations receive data privacy and perimeter isolation, while the everyday individual citizen is left entirely exposed—their private queries, identity footprints, and data streams funneled into centralized repositories where they are monitored, aggregated, and monetized without true individual ownership, compensation, or little recourse.

This surveilence capitalism, monetization framework is not a technical necessity; it is a choice to withhold privacy from individuals and the public while increasing their own bottom lines. They are charging a premium to enterprises for a portion of the principles of individual data ownership, control, and monetization that Robert DeMaio solely invented, disclosed, and patented over five years ago.

Under our foundational, June 2021 priority-dated patent baseline and continuing patent applications, we pioneered a true data-sovereign alternative to surveillance capitalism through our patented, universal, integrated codebase, authorized user device, and top-level username, among other technologies. These inventions and technologies prove that data ownership, control, and monetization can—and must—remain entirely with the individual and creator, bypassing independent corporate rules and boundaries entirely.

More on nvtip.com

• Revenue Optics Launches Pricing and Revenue Growth Management Practice, Names Shafohi Alamgir Vice President
• Popular AI planner Voiset launches version 2.0 and enters MENA at LEAP 2026 with full Arabic support
• CasaPerks and CredHub Partner to Help the Multifamily Industry Strengthen Resident Activation Through Credit-Building Rewards
• Open-Source Toroidal Engine Solves AI Data Center GPU Starvation
• Mt. Rose Church Announces New Book of Revelation Bible Study in Reno

We urge Congress to recognize that a tiered system separating citizen and business data standards violates the evolving principles of consumer property rights, and we urge federal oversight to mandate equal, uncompromised structural data ownership, privacy, and protection for everyone.

I look forward to detailing exactly how our patented architecture corrects this corporate overreach during your questions."

Phinge https://www.phinge.com

Robert DeMaio's Crunchbase Profile https://www.crunchbase.com/person/robert-charles-demaio

About Phinge Corporation

Phinge was founded and through Netverse® is being developed to disrupt today's AI and AI agents and outdated App technologies, including the App-store duopoly, by partnering with and giving its users and businesses data sovereignty-ownership, control and monetization of their own data, enhanced privacy and a better overall mobile experience.

Public Notice & Legal Reservation of Rights

Phinge Corporation and Robert Charles DeMaio expressly reserve the absolute and unrestricted right at any time, for any reason, and without prior notice to alter, add, delete, amend, or completely rescind any portion of this proposed statement, headline, or associated technical summaries. Enclosed herein is only a partial, non-exhaustive list of the inventions and innovations that inventor Robert DeMaio's patents, pending public applications, and disclosures cover. Phinge Corporation and Robert Charles DeMaio strictly reserve all rights, remedies, claims, and causes of action, both legal and equitable, under any applicable doctrine of patent law, including the doctrine of equivalents, without limitation, encompassing both listed and unlisted rights, patents, disclosures, and intellectual property. This communication and the text contained herein are issued solely for informational and public notice purposes.